Timeboost on Arbitrum Hits All-Time High, Redefining Transaction Ordering and MEV Capture

In a significant achievement for Ethereum Layer 2 scaling, Timeboost—a new transaction ordering system introduced on the Arbitrum network—has hit a record high in daily revenue. On one occasion, Timeboost pulled in $45.9K in a single day, which—if the same amount occurred every day for a year—would yield $16.7 million. That number is significant not just because it’s some kind of record for a system on Ethereum, but also because it shows how Arbitrum is increasingly getting adopted and how the mechanism could work to change the way systems on Ethereum and other networks deal with transactions. A Swift Rise: $100K in 4 Days Over the last four days, Timeboost has generated $100K in revenue, bringing its total revenue to $300K. This fast growth signals that it’s becoming a much more important part of Arbitrum’s economic infrastructure. Launched as a novel transaction ordering policy, Timeboost serves, in part, to stop the network spam that threatens to bog down Ethereum and its layer-2 solutions. But it also makes for an interesting MEV-boosting system when placed alongside other Arbitrum components. Timeboost on @Arbitrum reached a new ATH in daily revenue yesterday at $45.9k, translating to an annual revenue of $16.7M. This achievement boosted Timeboost’s revenue by $100k in just 4 days, bringing its total lifetime revenue to $300k. For those unfamiliar, Timeboost is a… https://t.co/Oz0WgMnLqa pic.twitter.com/MVLDsshwjH — Entropy Advisors (@EntropyAdvisors) May 12, 2025 For activity, Arbitrum, which is leading as a Layer 2 rollup, has seen Timeboost become a vital piece of its revenue model. Since early May, the mechanism has accounted for over 50% of the total revenue (REV) of the network, a clear signal of both its effectiveness and its popularity among users and developers. How Timeboost Works: A More Deterministic Blockchain Timeboost signifies quite a change in how transactions are put in order on Layer 2 networks. Up to now, transactions were usually organized based on which ones paid the highest fees—an arrangement that let MEV bots do their thing and extract profits through well-known and brazen methods like front-running and sandwiching. Timeboost, though, makes it much harder for those bots to do the kind of work that keeps them employed. With Timeboost, the first step is to ensure that transactions are timestamped the instant they are sent to the sequencer. This mechanism for ordering transactions deterministically means that later transactions can’t leapfrog earlier ones simply by offering higher fees. Consequently, the incentives for MEV bots to manipulate transaction order are dramatically reduced. In essence, Timeboost offers all participants, especially users who don’t have the technical sophistication or capital to compete with aggressive MEV strategies, a more transparent and equitable playing field. While this system might reduce the total revenue from activities related to MEV, it makes the overall environment more predictable and thus more beneficial for the ecosystem as a whole—especially for developers of applications that are sensitive to and/or dependent on the timing of certain events. Comparisons Across the L2 Landscape As Arbitrum’s Timeboost model is gaining traction, other Layer 2 solutions—like Base and Optimism—have taken a more conventional route. On these networks, priority fees make up 80-90% of revenue with MEV still playing a central role. This contrast illustrates a philosophical and practical difference in how Layer 2 platforms are balancing the trifecta of user experience, decentralization, and revenue generation. Timeboost inherently restricts its exposure to MEV. This could foster a long-term prevalence of Timeboost among validators and sequencers who are less profit-maximizing and more network-friendly. If that happens, it could lead to a more robust, spam-resistant, and user-trust-retaining network. And that might lead to sustainable growth. Since early May, Arbitrum’s Timeboost has accounted for over 50% of REV. Priority fees on Base and Optimism typically comprise 80-90% of REV, but Timeboost’s lower susceptibility to MEV may limit its prevalence. This is because txns are timestamped upon submission to the… pic.twitter.com/Q1577r4e48 — Marc Arjoon | Blockworks Research (@marcarjoon) May 6, 2025 Encouraging users not to reorder transactions or engage in sniping is a step toward making transaction mechanisms more ethical and user-friendly. Timeboost is designed to do just this, in part because it might make users benefit more from the transaction mechanisms themselves, and in part because behaviors like transaction reordering tend not to be very nice. Of course, like any new model of doing things, this could also be a model that other layer 2s or networks could look at and learn from. Conclusion Timeboost’s latest achievements are more than a financial milestone—they’re another step toward smarter, fairer transaction systems in the blockchain scaling world. As Arbitrum generates more revenue while keeping its network safe from MEV manipulation, Layer 2s everywhere may be paying attention. Whether you think of Timeboost as a future standard or an Arbitrum-specific innovation, its principles and near-light-speed growth make it a harbinger of the future of decentralized infrastructure. Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services. Follow us on Twitter @nulltxnews to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, Distributed Computing, and Metaverse news !

Source: NullTx